Underwriting and Processing of Mortgage Files or “Why Are You Asking Me for That”

August 25th, 2010

It’s no secret these days that banks and mortgage companies are being very strict and selective in loan approvals. Everything will be scrutinized, far more than ever before.  It used to be that if your credit scores and income seemed sufficient, the loan was routinely approved with hardly any questions or concerns at all.  Nowadays, though, banks want “blood” from borrowers and they are requiring documentation or explanation for even the most trivial of bits of information.

In light of this, our underwriter and processor’s job is to request, as accurately and as thoroughly as possible, every last detail that the bank may want to review.  Your financial life, and sometimes even your personal life is considered “fair game” for the banks these days, and as such, practically every bank deposit can be questioned, practically every address discrepancy will require letters of explanation (for example, if your W-2s are still being sent to your previous address, the bank will want to know why, or if they are being sent to your parents address in California, they might suspect you own a second home there!).  Any minor cell phone collection can be a reason to withhold approval or closing until satisfied, any medical collection might require mounds of documentation to prove innocence.  Outstanding (even if zero balance) home equity lines of credit can create havoc on a refinance.  Multiple job changes or concurrently holding more than one job will be suspect of “instability”, dramatic (even if legitimate) increases in income will be challenged and any change in status (for example, going from salaried to “independent contractor” even with same company) will shed some doubts in the minds of underwriters at the banks).

Each loan application has a “story” and generally the story unfolds as the loan processing and underwriting begins.  Sometimes we will know part of the story, but more often than not, the story will become clearer as the underwriters and processors delve into every nook and cranny of your file.  Sending in your loan application is the beginning of the journey to closing.  The starting point is your initial contact with the “loan officer” such as myself, or Isaac Shalom.  After receipt of the file and our preliminary review, the file then goes to the experts (our underwriting and processing staff) who are in the trenches every day with the bank approval authorities and it is they who prepare your file for the bank’s intense scrutiny.   Isaac and I work hand in hand with our underwriting staff and without their intense review of every single form, every single data entry on your credit report, every single address on all of your W-2s, bank statements, etc, your file would not proceed to the next stage.  They are our lifeline to protect your file from issues that could possibly surface at the bank (they make sure that every t is crossed and every “I” is dotted).  We all have the underwriters to thank for loan approvals because without them, Isaac and I, as loan officers, could not get your files done as efficiently and smoothly as they can.

Each and every file that comes through our doors is different.  Yours may be so straightforward that the file can be sent immediately to the bank, while  other files may need 10 to 15 different action items in order to create a file that doesn’t have “loose ends” and issues for approval.  In every case, though, it is through the dedication of our underwriting and processing staff that we can bring your file to as quick a closing as possible.

Financing 3, 4 or 5 Unit Co-op Buildings

August 18th, 2010

*Before reading this entry, please note that we have successfully closed EVERY SINGLE small unit co-op loan that has applied with us.

As everyone I am sure is aware, we are currently in the middle of the third year of our mortgage crisis and recession. It’s no surprise to anyone, therefore, that getting a mortgage these days is quite a challenging endeavor, filled with enormous amounts of requests for paperwork and obstacles in all facets of approval—from the appraisal process, to underwriting guidelines, to closing requirements.

Although nearly every part of the lending process has their issues, I’d like to focus for a bit, on one specific type of property that has always been a major problem for banks and for Fannie Mae (FNMA).  Recently, however, this issue has become, for those borrowers going directly to the lenders themselves, a very serious and major obstacle in getting approved.

I am referring specifically to the 3, 4 and 5 unit co-op buildings.  Ask any realtor or real estate attorney these days if they have encountered mortgage related issues on these properties and they will warn you up front in very clear and direct language:  “only use a reputable and local mortgage broker.  Do NOT go directly to the lender under any circumstances”.

You may be wondering why the extreme urgency and admonishment on the 3, 4 and 5 unit co-op buildings.  Brooklyn after all, is full of brownstones one might think that most lenders will lend on such properties, right? Unfortunately, the answer is a resounding NO.

To understand why you should not go directly through a bank for financing on these properties you need to understand a little bit about the history of Brownstones in Brooklyn.

Originally, most, if not all of the current Brownstones that you see were single-family mansions.  A huge number of them were cut up in the 1940’s, ’50s and ’60s to become rooming houses, four family apartment houses, or “SROs”.  Starting in the late 1970s and gaining enormous momentum in the real estate boom of the mid 80’s, landlords started realizing that converting these properties into co-op buildings could net huge sums of money.  Banks in the mid 80’s behaved just like they did during our most recent mortgage craze from 2002 to 2007—obtaining financing was incredibly easy, even for the hard to finance borrowers and properties.

Most of the nation’s co-ops are in New York and the vast majority of those have greater than 10 units.  Some have hundreds of units.  In Brooklyn, it would appear that most buildings are smaller, but in truth, throughout our metropolitan area, most co-ops are quite large.  With virtually all of our lenders selling their loans to FNMA, standards had to be set on co-op building criteria.  FNMA had to take a hard and fast look at the financial risks in lending to co-ops and provided the banks (well over 30 years ago) with guidelines that had to be met in order for a bank to be able to sell off their co-op loans to FNMA.

Originally, the FNMA lending standard for co-op building size was set at 10 units.  This is an arbitrary number, of course, but the reason for this size is that, in theory, it limited risk.  If one person out of ten had problems in paying the loan or if the loan went into default, at least there were 9 others in the building to pick up the pieces.  Fortunately through the continuous efforts of our huge local banks this eventually and gradually was reduced to five units. Portfolio lenders, of course, didn’t sell to FNMA and they set their own rules (most of them wouldn’t lend on co-ops anyway).  But, for most everyone who wanted excellent fixed rate loans (and some adjustables, too), the FNMA route was the best to follow.

To complicate matters further, banks have their own internal rules and guidelines, too and they will not finance more then 20% of a given building.  So, in the case of a 5 unit building, bank “A” will finance one and only one unit in that particular building.  Now, if there is a 3 or 4 unit building things get really tricky.  Fannie Mae won’t finance it, because it is too small, and banks won’t finance it because banking one unit would be more then their 20% limitation.  So the questions remain  –how can anyone finance a 3-4 unit building then? And if you are the fifth unit in a five unit building, what banks are left to even try to work with?

Let’s use an example: Let’s say bank A has already lent in a five-unit co-op building. Let’s go further and say a new buyer goes to bank A and requests financing. First off, the bank clerk will not know (AND IS NOT ALLOWED BY BANK POLICY) to let anyone know that the possibility of financing is practically nil for that lender in the building. Generally speaking, though, the bank reps are not trained well enough to even know about the problems with the small co-op buildings because their true function is to just “bring in the applications”.

Now, let’s say the same occurs with a three or four unit building. It will be only after 5 or 6 weeks that the loan will be denied, simply because FNMA has clearly indicated that they will not purchase loans in a co-op building that has less than five units.

At Universal we really pride ourselves as being the “kings of co-op lending”. I’ve been doing it now for over 28 years and have been specializing in the smaller buildings.  Both of our offices are located right smack in the middle of the greatest concentration of the 3-5 unit brownstones (Park Slope and Brooklyn Heights).  We have been able to work our way around Fannie Mae’s stringent policies and have worked with banks to bend their 20% rule. One of the very best reasons to use a local mortgage broker for the smaller unit co-op buildings is simply because we can shop the loan around and find a lender who has NOT lent in the building and who allows the 3 to 5 unit co-ops.  We always do the research FIRST when a loan of this sort comes to us so that we always find the right lender (who has not already lent in the building) to ensure that the loan closes.

Most importantly, we have been able to get FNMA to waive their strict 5 unit requirements and so, even in our current lending environment, we are going strong, providing the very best in FNMA financing to all of our 3, 4 and 5 unit co-op purchasers and refinances. These solutions to getting financing are both heavily reliant on years of relationship building with FNMA and all of our national and local banks as well.

If you are buying an a 3, 4, or 5 unit building, please make sure to call me right away.  718-210-1140.

Please be sure to follow Universal Mortgage on Facebook by clicking here so you can be up-to-date on everything Universal, from blog posts to community events.  We have some big plans set for this year and would love for you to join us!

Surviving The Good Faith Estimate

July 16th, 2010

I have been preparing good faith estimates for my clients ever since I have been in the industry—for nearly 30 years now.  Very fortunately all of our loan officers here at Universal Mortgage have been preparing Good Faith Estimates (GFE) with a standardized format ever since we opened in 1991. Our focus has always been to present the GFE to clients in a manner that is as easy to understand as possible.  We have developed a GFE form that simply and directly explains the estimates to clients, and we are always available to provide answers to the questions they may have. This system that we have developed has been an extremely effective tool and, from the client’s perspective, a very stress free way of dealing with a complex issue.

Then, January 1st 2010 rolled about and the government decided they needed to restructure the GFE to increase the accuracy of the estimates.  What resulted, however, could best be explained as using a sledgehammer to fix a problem that was meant for a chisel.  Everything fell apart.  The directives that the government issued were so convoluted that they created an environment of confusion and “guess work”.  Banks and mortgage brokers were forced to over exaggerate fees because of the penalties for being a few dollars off on estimates that were meant to be just that–estimates.  So, because the legislation is so difficult to understand, each bank has its own set of interpretations, creating a jungle of misunderstanding and confusion in the marketplace.

I cannot imagine a worse outcome of this debacle than our borrowers panicking because of governmental red tape and confusion. This is precisely why at Universal we stick with the tried and true way of providing estimates.  Yes, we provide clients with the new GFE form that reflects all the confusing and in most cases over-exaggerated calculations that the government requires, but we also continue to use our easier to digest forms that have proven effective for almost three decades. Client understanding of this process is paramount, now more then ever as things have become considerably more complicated.  The more our clients know and understand what is happening in their mortgage application process and why, the easier it will be for them to get through it.

I have an included an article that appeared in the Real Deal on how the mortgage industry is dealing with the GFE changes below.  And as always, please follow Universal Mortgage on Facebook by clicking here so you can be up-to-date on everything Universal from blog posts to community events.  We have some big plans for this year and would love for you to join us!

Grappling with ‘good faith’ _ The Real Deal 2_ New York Real Estate News

Property Appraisals and the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC)

June 9th, 2010

Whether they worked at a bank or with a mortgage broker, loan officers prior to mid 2009 were able to select and order appraisals from a bank approved appraiser list.  This system worked quite well, as long as the lender themselves monitored which local appraisers were qualified enough to be on the list.  When the mortgage crisis hit, Federal legislation (the Home Valuation Code of Conduct—HVCC) was put into effect to prevent loan officers from withholding business or payment unless the necessary appraised value was achieved.

If you have been keeping track of the other governmental changes the industry has seen over the past few months then chances are you already know where on the successful program chart the HVCC changes rank…low. If you have been reading this blog, in particular, then you may already be able to guess my opinions on this procedural complication.  I have already seen at least 20% of the appraisals that come in to be horribly incorrect! It can take weeks in order to fix them, if not longer. This translates into additional delays and stresses for the home-buyers, sellers, and realtors. Clearly I could go on in my frustrations and issues with the new HVCC, but fortunately, my loan coordinator, Isaac Shalom, summed it up clearly in a recent interview.

Isaac has been on my team for over five years and we work hand in hand on all of our files together.  His is our expert on appraisal evaluation, underwriting review and loan placement. Isaac works side by side with me on all of my transactions and was recently approached by a very influential trade publication, The American Banker, to discuss the appraisal issues created by the new legislation. Isaac’s tenacity in making sure every transaction proceeds smoothly is a trademark of our firm and he is one of the most respected loan officers in Brooklyn, particularly when it comes to the handling of tough files.  Like me, he battles the underwriters at banks daily, protecting each and every file from possible mishandling by bank clerks.

Isaac’s analysis is so on the mark that I wanted to share it with everyone so that these issues can be fully understood. His article can be found below.

I would also like to bring your attention to the new Universal Mortgage Inc. Facebook Group Page.  By becoming a fan you will not only automatically get updates from this blog but also be up to date on all of the exciting things Universal Mortgage is planning in the coming months. Please become a fan of Universal Mortgage Inc.’s Facebook page so you do not miss out, click here.

A Year On, HVCC Remains a Hot Button

American Banker  |  Monday, May 24, 2010

Little more than a year after the Home Valuation Code of Conduct went into effect, barring loan officers and mortgage brokers from selecting appraisers, there is near-unanimity that the rules have achieved their primary goal.

Whether that success has been worth the code’s side effects is still hotly debated.

By most accounts it is no longer possible for loan salespeople to coerce appraisers into inflating home values, a practice appraisers and housing advocates complained about for years. But critics say the HVCC has brought a raft of unintended consequences.

Loan originators complain of longer turnaround times and say their inability to communicate with appraisers has created snags in the processing of mortgage applications. Lenders are increasingly hiring appraisal management companies to dole out assignments. The appraisers complain that those companies are driving down their fees — suggesting darkly that the final effect will be to make appraisals more unreliable than they were before as experienced appraisers are pushed out of the business.

Even some who warned about the dangers of appraiser client pressure during the housing boom and supported the code early on say it has caused problems and needs fine-tuning.

“We still believe its goals are critical, but we believe the HVCC needs to be re-engineered, both from a consumer protection perspective and a safety and soundness perspective,” said David Berenbaum, chief program officer at the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, a nonprofit housing advocate.

The code was the result of negotiations throughout 2008 among New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The negotiations grew out of Cuomo’s investigation into whether the former Washington Mutual Inc. pressured appraisers to inflate home values.

Cuomo successfully pressed the two government-sponsored enterprises to agree not to purchase any loans from originators that did not have a process in place for ensuring the independence of appraisers. (His office did not respond to inquiries for this story.) Since the GSEs were by then among the few remaining secondary-market buyers, the code effectively applied industrywide.

Views From the Trenches
Tim Bradford, a loan officer with American Midwest Home Mortgage in Cleveland , said the turnaround time for appraisals has increased over the past year.

His company maintains a list of qualified appraisers who are selected in rotation, and when Bradford orders an appraisal, someone at American Midwest who is not involved in originating the loan assigns it.

“Sometimes, due to the randomness of the appraisals, it is slower than it had been,” he said. “I work in the general Cleveland market area. In the past, I might have had someone I liked to use for appraisals on the west side of Cleveland and someone else on the east side, because their home base of knowledge makes a difference.”

Not having that specialized knowledge costs the appraisers time, Bradford said.

“That can delay the turn time on the appraisal. They might have to travel a little farther, and because they may not be as versed in neighborhoods, they have to do a little extra research.”

The HVCC has also caused some uncertainty about the prices borrowers pay for their appraisals, Bradford said. Appraisers on his company’s list charge between $300 and $400, leaving Bradford unable to tell borrowers in advance what they will pay for an appraisal.

Isaac Shalom, a broker with Universal Mortgage in Brooklyn , N.Y. , says his dealings with appraisers have changed for the worse since the HVCC took effect — something he blames on brokers’ inability to communicate with appraisers before the appraisal begins.

“I understand that there used to be a lot of ‘negative’ guidance given to appraisers,” he said. “But now there is no guidance at all. We used to be able to prepare appraisers, and now we can’t.”

About half the property types Shalom handles in Brooklyn are co-operative buildings, which can range in size from two units to 500 units. Smaller co-ops can be difficult to finance, he said, and it is important for appraisers to understand that the comparables used in an appraisal must be truly comparable, or the bank is not going to accept the loan application.

Nevertheless, Shalom said, “I have had two appraisers in the past month use a 20-unit co-op as a comparable for two-unit co-ops.”

Much of the problem stems from unnecessarily complex lines of communication, Shalom said. “It’s one big game of broken telephone.”

With appraisal management companies employing service companies sometimes as far away as India , “the information passes through four or five people, and by the time it gets to the appraiser, important information is missing,” Shalom said. “I now get calls from people trying to set up appointments to see the properties — I’m not a realtor.”

And while many of the complaints arising from the HVCC have centered on (possibly apocryphal) tales of appraisers driving 100 miles out of their normal territory to do an appraisal in an area they are unfamiliar with, Shalom says that in New York City, pulling an appraiser only a few miles away from his normal territory can leave him out of his depth.

To a person thousands of miles away, assigning an appraisal in Brooklyn to an appraiser located in midtown Manhattan may seem like a nonissue — they are little more than two miles apart as the crow flies.

But expertise in appraising property in midtown Manhattan does not translate to expertise in Brooklyn , where understanding neighborhood dynamics is essential to accurate property value assessment, Shalom said.

“If you are looking at a property on the north slope of Park Slope in Brooklyn , you can’t cross Atlantic Avenue to get one of your comparables. It’s a completely different neighborhood,” he said.

You Get What You Pay For The code does not mandate that lenders outsource the ordering of appraisals to appraisal management companies. But as a practical matter, doing so may be easier and cheaper for a lender than building an in-house appraisal department from scratch.

Leslie Sellers, owner and principal of Leslie Sellers & Associates, an appraisal firm in Knoxville , Tenn. , said the HVCC has laid the groundwork for an inevitable degrading of the appraisal profession.

“It has been completely devastating to the industry,” said Sellers, the 2010 president of the Appraisal Institute, a trade group. “Management companies have created havoc in the industry.”

Sellers acknowledged that “the ultimate intent was independence of the appraiser, and in terms of the independence it has been successful.”

But in his view, the move to appraisal management companies has just replaced one type of bullying with another.

Appraisal management companies are typically paid a flat fee for their appraisal services, and make money on the margin between that fee and what they have to pay an appraiser. Naturally, this leads to downward pressure on appraisal prices, as AMCs look to maximize profit.

“Over a period of time, as you get cheaper and cheaper fees, the more competent appraisers who can do other work are going to do that, and you are left with the less-competent appraisers,” Sellers said.

Berenbaum at the National Community Reinvestment Coalition agreed that the code has given appraisal management companies more power in the market, and that the reduced fees they offer appraisers have caused seasoned professionals to leave the business.

“The fee is not adequate to assure the accuracy of the appraisal being done,” he said. “As a result, appraisers are being forced out of the field.”

Given the current complexity of the market, this is no time to be driving experienced appraisers out of the business, industry observers said.

“Foreclosures make up such a large percentage of properties now on the market that their values are becoming prominent, and they are being used as the comparables now,” said Robert Hyder, a mortgage market analyst in the secondary markets department at Total Mortgage Services LLC in Milford , Conn.

Experienced appraisers working in a market they are familiar with are the only ones able to give knowledgeable assessments of property values under such conditions, Hyder said.

“But talking with the loan officers I am familiar with, they are working with appraisers who are not from the area at all,” he said. “More inexperienced appraisers are doing the jobs that more experienced appraisers were, and they are traveling further and further to do their jobs.”

The appraisers and consumer activists like Berenbaum were also disappointed to learn last week that instead of funding an independent “institute” to field and review complaints about HVCC violations, as originally planned, Fannie and Freddie will do the job themselves. With the GSEs bleeding taxpayers’ money, the $24 million institute was no longer a justifiable investment, FHFA said.

The regulators and GSEs involved in the negotiation of the code say that they are pleased with the results.

In October a Freddie Mac executive told members of the Mortgage Bankers Association that Freddie’s routine procedure of checking a percentage of the appraisals on the mortgages it buys against its own valuation model demonstrated that appraisals became more accurate with the advent of the HVCC.

Alfred Pollard, general counsel for the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator and conservator for Fannie and Freddie, said the code has done what it was intended to do.

“We believe the HVCC has added to the insulation of appraisers from undue influence,” he said.

The practice of separating the ordering of appraisals from the sales force “is embedded now in market practices,” Pollard said. “It is going to continue, and it is a good thing.”

Asked to respond to the complaints from appraisers and loan officers, Pollard said many of the issues facing the home valuation industry were systemic and inevitable — not a result of the HVCC.

“The major complaints we are hearing reflect problems existing in the valuation industry and the valuation process,” he said. “While the code might not be perfect, I don’t see them as problems with the code.”

Complaints that the HVCC is responsible for the increased influence of appraisal management companies are misguided, he said.

“AMCs were around before the code; that is a market development,” he said. “Banks were moving away from in-house appraisers before this code existed.”

Similarly, Jeff Schurman, executive director of the Title/Appraisal Vendor Management Association, said the complaints about the HVCC and about appraisal management companies are an overreaction to a painful change in the market — not an objective assessment of reality,

“From the lenders’ side, the HVCC seems to be working well,” he said. “There is much more scrutiny of appraisals in the past year or so, and the result has been positive. Yes it has impacted the quality — and in a good way.”

But from the appraisers’ side, Schurman said, it doesn’t seem to be working as well. First of all, he said, the HVCC fundamentally changed the business model for appraisers.

“They had built their businesses around personal relationships, and that was yanked away from them,” he said. “That is really difficult.”

It is also understandable for appraisers to complain that the prices they can command for their work are falling, Schurman said. “But the next sentence out of their mouths is, ‘It’s because of those damned AMCs.’ ”

Schurman said the decline in appraisal fees is purely market-driven.

“If you look at the volume of appraisals, it is down by almost half — so there is an oversupply of appraisers,” he said. Fees are falling not because AMCs are gouging their appraisers, he said, but “because of supply and demand.”

Schurman also took issue with the claim that veteran appraisers have quit the business, leaving less competent colleagues to do the work.

He said a survey of TAVMA members found that appraisers on the panels of member AMCs had an average of 15 years’ experience. “In order to get into an AMC panel, you have to be a pretty good appraiser in the first place.”

For now, appraisers concerned about their future have pinned their hopes on an effort to have Congress make appraisal management companies subject to regulation by state-level appraiser subcommittees.

According to Sellers, the Appraisal Institute president, 10 states have adopted model legislation proposed by the trade group for the registration and regulation of AMCs, and 20 more are considering the legislation.

Among other things, the model legislation requires AMCs to adhere to standards mandating the qualification of both the ownership of the AMC and of the appraisers on its panel.

But the heart of the model legislation is a 10-part section outlining how AMCs must set appraisal fees and requiring that AMC fee schedules be subject to the approval of the appraiser subcommittee.

“It all comes down to this: We need to move it back to where competency is the No. 1 reason for choosing an appraiser,” Sellers said.

Berenbaum’s group, an early advocate of the code, continues to support it, even though the coalition is “very troubled” by aspects of its implementation, he said.

Another shortcoming, Berenbaum said, is that the HVCC does nothing to allow appraisal professionals to act as a check to unscrupulous real estate professionals in short sales.

In a short sale, the borrower sells the home for less than is owed on the mortgage and the lender accepts a discounted payoff. This has become an increasingly popular alternative to foreclosure.

But Berenbaum said the practice of “flopping” — in which a short-sale property is sold at an artificially low price only to be resold at fair market value — is a growing problem. It is made possible, he said, because in such sales appraisers are not part of the process — the property is priced based on a “broker price opinion.”

This leaves the real estate agent issuing the opinion subject to the same sort of pressure from a buyer that the HVCC was designed to protect appraisers from — only in this case the buyer wants a property to be undervalued.

The answer to the flopping problem, Berenbaum said, would be to widen the scope of the HVCC to require that appraisers be part of all home sales, effectively removing BPOs from the equation.

Here to Stay The HVCC never relied on legislation for its effect — its power comes from the incorporation by Fannie and Freddie of appraisal independence standards in their underwriting guidelines. With both GSEs in conservatorship, and the conservator in full-throated support of the HVCC, it is a long shot that those guidelines will be changed to remove the appraiser independence.

There have been a number of stop-and-start efforts to “repeal” the HVCC through changes to federal law. Such a provision was contained in the financial reform legislation that passed the House late last year, but there isn’t one in the Senate version of the bill, which is widely believed to be the model for any final reform bill.

The HVCC itself has a formal sunset date that will take the agreement out of force later this year (after it has been in place for 18 months).

But even those who believe the HVCC has done substantial harm to the industry have no illusions about its influence disappearing after it sunsets.

“It’s not going away. No way, no how,” the Appraisal Institute’s Sellers said. “It’s embedded in the system now.”

Rob Garver , who covered regulatory issues as an American Banker reporter from 1999 to 2003, is a freelance writer in Springfield , Va.

For Mortgage Applications Preparation is Key

May 25th, 2010

Last week (Sunday May, 23rd) an article appeared in the New York Times entitled “Five Ways for Buyers to Outsmart the Market.” Found here. It detailed the many obstacles facing a potential homebuyer in the current market and, as the title implies, ways to overcome those obstacles as easily as possible.  The truth of the matter, especially when talking about mortgages, is that “as easily as possible” should NOT be confused with “easy.”  Between government regulations and bank policies getting a mortgage today is no simple task.

The Times article quite accurately described the mortgage application in one word “Paperwork.” In years past getting a mortgage was an open and shut case, you go in, you apply, and more often then not, you were approved. This revolving door lending policy was a big influence on the resulting mortgage mess and crisis that we currently are facing. The government and banks are now over compensating for this flaw with a litany of policies and requirements that are the equivalent of placing a jam in that door. The red tape in loan application has become so thick that in some cases quite a significant amount of paperwork previously submitted needs to be updated once or twice prior to closing. This process can take three months or more. This gets even more complicated if during that time period the buyer takes out other loans or receives unexpected income. If either of those two things happens the whole process could be completely restarted, or even worse, stopped dead in its tracks.

So what does the NY Times article suggest you do to “outsmart the market?”  The answer is due diligence in your preparedness. By being aware ahead of time of what the current government and bank policies are, and by gathering the paperwork and documentation needed for mortgage application before ever stepping foot in a potential new home, you will be in a better position to avoid many of the pitfalls.

This concept is certainly not a new one, but not being new does not mean it is not worth repeating. Knowing what you are about to get into prior to applying for a mortgage and acting accordingly is key to successfully making it to closing. This is a concept that I am continually sharing with all of the potential homeowners who come in through Universal Mortgage’s doors. In fact to make it easier, we have created a checklist of precisely what anyone looking for a mortgage should do and have included that list below. When applying for a mortgage there are a lot of factors working against you, with proper knowledge and an experienced Mortgage Broker at your side, You can avoid many mortgage processing problems that so many of today’s customers face.



DOCUMENTATION CHECKLIST

Thank you for choosing Universal Mortgage for your home financing needs. In order to obtain a quick decision from the bank on your application, the following documents are needed:

  • Copies of two (2) current and consecutive paystubs for each borrower.
  • Copies of W-2 Forms for the past two (2) years for each borrower.
    Please note: For self-employed, commissioned, or where greater then 20% of annual income is from a bonus, please also send in your last two (2) years’ Federal Tax Returns (State returns are NOT required).
  • Copies of all pages of recent bank, broker, and retirement statements for the past two (2) months, which reflect sufficient liquid assets to cover your down payment, closing costs, and reserves (assets remaining after closing). All statements must list the institution name, account number, full name, current balance, and recent transactions.
  • If you will be receiving a gift for any part of the down payment or closing costs, please submit proof of receipt of the gift and proof of the donor’s ability to give the gift. Additionally, at the time of application, we will supply a form for the donor to fill out.
  • Copy of the Contract of Sale for the subject property, signed by all parties, with all changes initialed. If it is unavailable right now, we will obtain it from your attorney later in the process. (If this is a purchase transaction.)
  • If you own other real estate, please submit:
    • Copy of signed Contract of Sale for real estate you own, which is pending sale.
    • Evidence of mortgage, property tax, and insurance payment amounts on each property tax bill, homeowner’s insurance bill, and mortgage coupons.
    • Signed copies of all current leases on each property, if rented out.
    • Signed copies of your Federal Tax Returns (Form 1040) for the past two (2) years, with all schedules attached, if you owned and rented out other real estate during the past two (2) years.
  • Copy of front & back of your driver’s license, passport, government-issued ID card, green card, or visa (only one (1) form of ID for each borrower is necessary).
  • Signed and completed loan application form. If this is an application for joint credit please:
    • Married Couples: Please use one (1) form for both borrowers, and sign the first and fourth pages.
    • All others: Please use separate form for each borrower and sign the fourth page.
  • Signed and completed Disclosures attached.

Credit Checks Just Prior to Closing—Banks are Policing Your Every Move

May 18th, 2010

Fannie Mae’s new “Loan Quality Initiative” will go into effect on June 1, 2010.  This is yet another new regulation that makes smooth, timely closings nearly impossible to achieve. Not surprisingly, this new initiative creates more problems from home buyers and makes the process of getting a mortgage approved  and closed even more complicated than it already is.

Fannie Mae’s new initiative requires lenders to re-run a new credit check on every loan just before closing.  It is designed, basically, as a way of checking if a borrower has acquired any new debts between mortgage application and the actual closing.  If new debts are discovered, then verification of new monthly payments must be provided and the borrower must then be qualified with the new debt. If the borrower no longer qualifies, his loan will be rejected, as late as one day before the closing!!!! Or, if it is just an inquiry, then he will have to write and sign an explanation of what the inquiry was for. Will he be believed? Will the bank investigate further? These questions remain unresolved and we will once again have to battle it out with the lenders.  This process can literally take a week or even more in underwriting, creating havoc with the closing time-frames.

At first glance, Fannies’ new regulation may seem reasonable. After all, banks are still saddled with huge delinquencies and foreclosures from individuals who truly have way too much debt. Quite a huge number of individuals took out mortgages (and extra debt) that they just couldn’t afford. This new rule and so many of our new regulations are designed to prevent that.

The problem with the new regulation is that it is way too unrealistic. Practically everyone I know of (including myself in all of my home purchases) prepares for their purchase and move within the few weeks prior to closing. There is possibly new furniture to buy, curtains, appliances, details with renovation, etc. all of which need to be paid in cash or financing arranged.  This rule prevents people from legitimately preparing for the move to their new house. Just imagine furnishing a three-bedroom house solely with what you had in your one bedroom basement apartment! Mortgage underwriting rules and ratios are already incredibly strict. Now, post approval and post “clearance to close” they have gotten even more draconian.

The best way to avoid this problem from occurring on one’s loan, of course, is clear and simple. DO NOT INQUIRE OR TAKE OUT ANY LOANS, CREDIT, OR FINANCING other than your mortgage application until the loan closes, period, plain and simple. Otherwise, expect problems, delays, and possible last minute rejections.

Jumbo Financing is Back (Finally!!!)

May 12th, 2010

The freeze on jumbo and super jumbo mortgage financing is finally beginning to thaw. While this improvement is almost imperceptible on a daily or weekly basis, when you take a step back and look at where the industry currently is, compared to where it was a few months ago, the progress becomes clearer.

Yesterday, one of our major national banks announced what I would call a bombshell. They have extended to us a new super jumbo program for loans up to $2,000,000. It’s an incredible program, allowing for just 20% down on loan amounts up to $1,500,000. Under certain circumstances, we can also arrange 80% up to $2,000,000 as well, but with higher post closing reserves needed. Credit scores for this program are a firm 720 or better. If you scroll down  you can see all the major bullet points of improvement.

Here are some of the parameters:

a.       1-2 family houses allowed with just 20% down. Post closing liquidity required of at least 10%.

b.       3-4 family houses have two different tiers:

1.       20% down is okay as long as the borrower has 40% post closing reserves, not more than 50% of these reserves from retirement accounts.  And,

2.       25% down is required with less post closing reserves. In this case just 20% post closing reserves required, with not more than 50% allowed from retirement accounts

All of the above is for loans up to $1,500,000

c.       1 – 2 family houses can still finance 80% for loan amounts from $1,500,000 to $2,000,000, but the post closing reserves are a lot higher.

d.       At 25% down and at 30% down, the post closing reserve requirement becomes much more lenient (once again for loans up to $2,000,000.

Property types:

1)       Co-ops allowed

2)       Condos (generally very high pre-sale required)

3)       2-4 family houses

Refinance transactions are allowed as long as they are no cash out.  Second homes and investor properties are not allowed

Deal With Lenient Lender Is Another Sign of the Improving Market

May 6th, 2010

I’ve been mentioning for the past several months that things have been getting just a little bit better with mortgage underwriting and guidelines product parameters.  Just this week, they got MUCH more lenient, at least with a couple of our lenders.  Here are some details:

I. The no-income check loan is back — at least in modified form and with some truly phenomenal rates.  This loan type never really went away even during the worst of the mortgage crisis, but rates were, in most cases, truly horrible. Now, however, we have a GREAT, lenient lender with excellent, market rates on this program.  Here are some details:

a.       Credit scores must be greater than 700 for each borrower.

b.       Full asset verification is required and no gifts allowed.

c.       Post closing reserves must be greater than four months of the mortgage payments.  Retirement accounts do not count.

d.       Primary residences only.

e.       Single family houses or condos only.  No co-ops (so far) and no 2-4 family houses.

f.        Income figures are NOT disclosed at all; we merely indicate where the borrower actually works and phone number.  Self employed, retired, and                         salaried borrowers are all eligible, as long as the file makes sense.

g.       Maximum loan of $1,000,000 with a maximum loan to value of 50% (soon to be 60%).

h.       Refinances are eligible.  Cash out is not allowed.

i.         Rates are EXCELLENT—only .25% higher than standard regular full income check rates.  Fixed and adjustable rate programs are available.

II. New Construction Condos—ONLY 25% PRE-SALE REQUIRED

We have been able to not only find a lender with incredibly lenient guidelines on new construction condos, but were able to leverage our clout within the industry to become one of only a very few mortgage brokerages to be invited to participate in this special program. Here are some of the parameters:

a.       Only 25% sold or in contract required.  This is phenomenal!!!

b.       Small buildings (5 unit or more) are acceptable.

c.       No questionnaire required, nor financials, nor insurance, etc.

d.       Subject unit must have a minimum of 500 square feet.  Studio apartments okay, but must be common to area.

e.       All condos will have a premium to rate of an eighth of a percent.

f.         Maximum commercial space no more than 20%

g.       20% down to $750,000

h.       25% down from $750.050 to $1,250,000.

We will all benefit tremendously with the addition of these two “new” programs.   This is exactly what our marketplace needs and it’s great to see that a local lender has perceived this need and implemented these programs to take advantage of a tremendous opportunity!

Good Faith Estimates Made Simple

April 26th, 2010

Having scoured the Internet, I have finally discovered an easy to understand equation so we can all figure out what numbers to use for the new Good Faith Estimate required of all lending entities as of 1/1/2010.  It’s refreshing to see and understand the clarity that the Federal Government’s new RESPA rules (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) bring to the table.  See below for further clarification.

Sarcasm aside, I wanted to point out just how challenging it can be to prepare the good faith estimate with the obtuse and new instructions set by the government.  EVERY bank has interpreted the new rules differently and therefore the numbers will all look different depending on bank and program.  Because of this, I tell all of my clients that this process is both shocking and confusing in its complexities.  I let them know that I am with them every step of the way to correctly interpret the form. It always helps to have someone on your side of this darn chalkboard who can read it properly.



Park Slope Named Most Livable Neighborhood in New York

April 23rd, 2010

Last week’s New York Magazine included an article titled “The Most Livable Neighborhoods in New York.” Guess where the number one place to live in the five boroughs is — Park Slope!  This decision was based on an analysis of twelve categories including: Housing Cost, Transit, Shopping and Services, Safety, Restaurants, Schools, Diversity, Creative Capital, Housing Quality, Green Space, Health & Environment, and Nightlife.  Park Slope ranked above grade or superlative for most of these categories.

Of course, for those of us who are already familiar with Park Slope, we did not need New York Magazine to reach this conclusion.  I have worked in the neighborhood since 1989 and have seen all of the positive changes that have taken place over the past two decades. There has been a wonderful appreciation in the homes here and their values, even in recessions, have shown a remarkable resiliency.  Plus, as the article highlights, it is just a vibrant, fun, safe place to call home. As great as the last twenty years were for the neighborhood, I can tell you the next twenty will be even greater as it continues to improve upon itself.

In addition to Park Slope taking the top spot, I was pleased to see that Cobble Hill ranked in 4th and Brooklyn Heights (our newest office just opened there last year!) took 6th.  Please click here to see the full article yourself.